Report: 1605 N Waters Ct, Tampa, FL 33605

Florida FDEP ERIC Waste Cleanup Sites is an administrative PROGRAM REGISTRY published for informational purposes: each row is a cleanup CASE ENROLMENT located by a single reported point, not a contamination extent, a determination, or a survey. Presence or absence of a point near a location is a SCREENING signal that tells you what to ask FDEP or an environmental professional — it never answers the question, and a Phase I ESA it is not.

Sources: Florida FDEP ERIC Waste Cleanup Sites · Related findings: FDEP ERIC cleanup sites within 1 mile

Florida FDEP Registered Storage Tank Facilities is an administrative REGISTRY published for informational purposes: each row is an agency record located by a single reported point, not a contamination extent, a determination, or a survey. Presence or absence of a point near a location is a SCREENING signal that tells you what to ask FDEP or an environmental professional — it never answers the question, and a Phase I ESA it is not.

Sources: Florida FDEP Registered Storage Tank Facilities · Related findings: Storage tank facilities within 0.5 miles

Florida FDEP Petroleum Contamination (PCTS) Discharges is an administrative REGISTRY published for informational purposes: each row is an agency record located by a single reported point, not a contamination extent, a determination, or a survey. Presence or absence of a point near a location is a SCREENING signal that tells you what to ask FDEP or an environmental professional — it never answers the question, and a Phase I ESA it is not. The eligibility column records FDEP's own STATE CLEANUP-FUNDING classification for a discharge; no funding entitlement, obligation or cost recovery follows from that token for any particular party, and neither token says anything about whether contamination is present.

Sources: Florida FDEP Petroleum Contamination (PCTS) Discharges · Related findings: Petroleum contamination discharges within 0.5 miles

Florida FDEP Brownfield Sites (Executed BSRAs) is an administrative REGISTRY of DESIGNATIONS published for informational purposes: each row is a mapped boundary digitised from a designating instrument, not a contamination extent, a site assessment or a survey. Presence or absence of a polygon at a location is a SCREENING signal that tells you what to ask FDEP or an environmental professional — it never answers the question, and a Phase I ESA it is not. A designation confers eligibility for state incentives and statutory liability protection on a party who enters an agreement; NO incentive, liability position or entitlement follows for any particular party from a polygon in these bytes.

Sources: Florida FDEP Brownfield Sites (Executed BSRAs) · Related findings: Nearest brownfield site

jv: Just value (USD, DOUBLE) — Florida's statutory market-value standard BEFORE caps/exemptions. The closest column to market value, but still an assessment, not a sale price.

Sources: Florida Statewide Parcels (FDOR Cadastral) · Related findings: Assessor parcel and building characteristics

lnd_val: Land value component of just value (USD).

Sources: Florida Statewide Parcels (FDOR Cadastral) · Related findings: Assessor parcel and building characteristics

lnd_sqfoot: Land area in square feet as REPORTED BY THE ASSESSOR (DOUBLE; often 0/blank or stale). For geometric area use planar ST_Area inside an EQUAL-AREA projection: ST_Area(ST_Transform(geom, 'OGC:CRS84', 'EPSG:3086', always_xy := true)) (Florida GDL Albers, metres). NOT ST_Area_Spheroid, which reads X as LATITUDE in DuckDB and under-reports ~6x at Florida longitudes; planar ST_Area on CRS84 returns square DEGREES.

Sources: Florida Statewide Parcels (FDOR Cadastral) · Related findings: Assessor parcel and building characteristics

tot_lvg_ar: FDOR NAL Field 50 TOT_LVG_AREA, 'Total Living or Usable Area' (DOUBLE, square feet) — an APPRAISER-COMPUTED EFFECTIVE AREA, NOT a physical measurement. FDOR defines it as the total EFFECTIVE area of all improvements on the property, obtained by applying county-chosen percentage factors that 'may be less than or greater than one' (FDOR's own examples: a garage factor below 1, an enclosed warehouse office above 1), totalled over all floors of a multi-story building and over all property record cards sharing the parcel number. So it is NOT heated area, NOT gross / rentable / leasable building area (a listing's GBA or RBA), NOT an appraisal's square footage, and — because the factors are COUNTY CONVENTIONS — NOT COMPARABLE ACROSS COUNTIES. It EXCLUDES improvements classified as special features (paving, canopies, docks, tanks) and excludes land. Never present tot_lvg_ar as 'building size' and never reconcile it against a listing's square footage. It is carried across EVERY DOR use code, so on commercial / industrial / institutional parcels it is populated but is still this effective-area construct, not the leasable envelope. The gross/rentable envelope is NOT in this roll at all: the county property appraiser's own building record is where it lives, so a size question on a non-residential parcel is UNANSWERED here — a figure taken from that record is that source's stated claim (screening), never a measurement from this layer. 0 SHIPS AS 0, never NULL (unlike no_buldng / act_yr_blt, whose DOR 0-filler is NULLed): a 0 is the source's filler — neither 'unknown' nor evidence of no building (rows with a building, and rows with a NULL building count, both carry 0 here).

Sources: Florida Statewide Parcels (FDOR Cadastral) · Related findings: Assessor parcel and building characteristics

no_buldng: Number of buildings (INTEGER; DOR 0-filler shipped as NULL).

Sources: Florida Statewide Parcels (FDOR Cadastral) · Related findings: Assessor parcel and building characteristics

act_yr_blt: Actual year built (INTEGER; 0-filler shipped as NULL).

Sources: Florida Statewide Parcels (FDOR Cadastral) · Related findings: Assessor parcel and building characteristics

Estimated ad-valorem tax (tv_sd x school millage / 1000 + tv_nsd x county-wide non-school millage / 1000) is a SCREENING estimate and a county-wide FLOOR: it excludes municipal / MSTU / CDD sub-county millage, excludes ALL non-ad-valorem assessments (which can rival the ad-valorem tax), and reflects the CURRENT owner's capped/exempted taxable value — a buyer's post-sale bill is generally HIGHER (reassessment to just value). Not a tax bill.

Sources: Florida Property-Tax Millage — Counties (Ad Valorem) · Related findings: Ad valorem property tax floor estimate

No insurance, lending or permitting obligation follows from a zone code in this layer: those attach to a specific structure and loan, a parcel can carry more than one zone, and a LOMA/LOMR-F or a newer effective FIRM can change the determination without changing these polygons. Only the effective FIRM/FIS and the lender's own flood determination settle that question. Market-context statistics derived from this layer (e.g. the local prevalence or share of flood zones) are screening estimates over an aggregation of the NFHL polygons — never a parcel-level determination; the layer's own zone-membership determination is reported and graded separately. An SFHA designation describes the 1%-annual-chance regulatory MAPPING/insurance extent, NOT an annualised flood or loss probability.

Sources: FEMA NFHL Flood Hazard Zones (Polygons) · Related findings: FEMA flood zone parcel coverage

Scan bounded to this layer's `state='FL'` hive partition — reported values (counts, distances, areas, shares) reflect features stored under that partition value only; features stored under other partition values were not scanned.

Sources: FEMA NFHL Flood Hazard Zones (Polygons) · Related findings: FEMA flood zone parcel coverage

The Florida Water Management Inventory records a per-parcel service CLASSIFICATION, published by the Florida Department of Health across a three-tier certainty vocabulary (Known > Likely > SWL). It is NOT a utility connection record: a classification here does not establish an active water or sewer connection at the property, and it is not a service commitment from any utility. The certainty TIER is load-bearing and must be carried with the value — never collapse Known / Likely / SWL to a binary 'public vs well' or 'sewer vs septic', and never restate a classification as the property being 'served by' or 'connected to' anything. County source data carries a per-row vintage from FLWMI's phased 2018-2024 rollout; in counties running septic-to-sewer conversion programs a classification can be stale in EITHER direction. Confirm current service with the utility.

Sources: Florida Water Management Inventory (FLWMI) — Parcel Water/Wastewater · Related findings: FLWMI drinking water and wastewater classification

SCREENING cohort benchmark from qualified assessor sales — NOT an appraisal, NOT an opinion of value, NOT parcel-specific comparable selection, and NOT the s. 195.096 assessment-level study. Three statistic families each carry their OWN count and sufficiency flag; read a statistic only beside its own count. Prices are documentary-stamp derived, quantized to $100 and not time-adjusted; the $/sqft denominator is FDOR EFFECTIVE area, not a measurement, and is withheld outside improved-residential bands. A formal valuation requires a licensed appraiser.

Sources: Florida Qualified Improved-Property Comparable Sales · Related findings: Improved institutional sales benchmark

ACS median gross rent is a five-year average of rents ALREADY BEING PAID by sitting tenants, pooled across all unit sizes and structure types and including utilities — it lags asking rents and is NOT an asking rent, NOT an achievable rent for a vacant unit, and NOT an estimate for any individual property.

Sources: US Census ACS 5-year — Census Tracts · Related findings: Census tract socioeconomic and housing characteristics

No insurance, lending or permitting obligation follows from a zone code in this layer: those attach to a specific structure and loan, a parcel can carry more than one zone, and a LOMA/LOMR-F or a newer effective FIRM can change the determination without changing these polygons. Only the effective FIRM/FIS and the lender's own flood determination settle that question. Market-context statistics derived from this layer (e.g. the local prevalence or share of flood zones) are screening estimates over an aggregation of the NFHL polygons — never a parcel-level determination; the layer's own zone-membership determination is reported and graded separately. An SFHA designation describes the 1%-annual-chance regulatory MAPPING/insurance extent, NOT an annualised flood or loss probability. This layer publishes NO geometry column — every row is located only by an H3 cell index, at resolution r8 or coarser. A match therefore means the subject falls in a cell the mapped feature was indexed into; it does NOT mean the feature overlaps the subject, and these bytes cannot tell those two cases apart. A cell at this resolution can be larger than an entire residential parcel, so a whole parcel can sit inside one cell the feature never touches. Confirm any overlap against a geometry-bearing source before reporting it as a fact about the subject.

Sources: FEMA NFHL Flood Hazard Zones · Related findings: Neighborhood flood zone distribution, Neighborhood flood zone distribution

A cartographic proximity screen of parcel-polygon geometry against mapped TIGER road centerlines. The ONLY claim it licenses is the distance BAND: 'the parcel boundary lies within ~30 m of a mapped road centerline'. It is not a survey and not a title search, so it can establish neither frontage (a boundary length abutting a right-of-way) nor legal access nor landlocked status — and that holds in BOTH directions: a near road is not 'not landlocked' any more than a far road is 'landlocked'. TIGER centerline positional accuracy is uneven and comparable to the ~30 m threshold in some counties, and TIGER omits driveways, private drives and easements. Legal access, easements and permitted access points are title and survey questions.

Sources: Florida Per-Parcel Road Access: Frontage + Landlocked Screen (TIGER) · Related findings: Parcel road centerline proximity band

FEMA Zone X (D_Zone value 'X'). The letter alone does NOT give the class, and 44 CFR 64.3(a)(1) is why: its FIRM zone-symbol table lists X TWICE — once beside B as 'Areas of moderate flood hazards or areas of future-conditions flood hazard', and once beside C as 'Area of minimal hazards'. The `zone_subty` column resolves it, decoded by this layer's `fema_flood_zone_subtype` codebook, and that decode also ships per row as `zone_subty_label`. The Area of Minimal Flood Hazard (FEMA subtype 2000) is the ONLY subtype in that codebook denoting the minimal class. MEASURED 2026-09-11 over the 53 published partitions of `fema_flood_zones` — that POLYGON layer's X rows are the denominator for every share in this entry, and the `fema_flood_zones_h3` companion's per-cell rows give different ones — 852,957 of its 4,459,920 Zone X polygons (19.12%) carry it; the other 3,606,963 (80.88%) carry a subtype that is NOT minimal, and those are not one class either. FEMA's D_Zone_Subtype table marks the shaded-X family with footnote 6, and that family is BROADER than the 0.2%-annual-chance floodplain: it also carries the 1%-annual-chance subtypes shallower than a foot (0400) and draining under one square mile (0410), so a shaded X row can be INSIDE the CURRENT 1%-annual-chance floodplain rather than merely on the 0.2% fringe. The future-conditions subtype (0300) — the only subtype footnote 6's own TEXT names — is NOT part of that reading: it is the 1%-annual-chance hazard under FUTURE watershed conditions. Separately: 25,307 of those 4,459,920 X polygons (0.57%) carry a levee subtype, and this entry assigns them NO hazard class. MEASURED on the same sweep with those 25,307 as the denominator, 24,873 (98.29%) carry AREA WITH REDUCED FLOOD RISK DUE TO LEVEE — not a FEMA domain value, and it states no accreditation status at all — and only 434 (1.71%) name one (432 accredited, 2 provisionally accredited); read `zone_subty` for what each row does and does not say. A further 796 (0.018%) carry a FLOODWAY-family subtype, which is the opposite of a lesser hazard. No published X row lacks a subtype — 0 of those 4,459,920 carry a NULL `zone_subty` on the same sweep — so read the subtype and never the bare letter. Zone X is NOT outside flood risk: FloodSmart, the NFIP's own site, states that 'over the past 10 years (2014 - 2024), nearly one-third of NFIP flood insurance claims (29%) came from areas located outside of current high-risk flood areas' (https://www.floodsmart.gov/flood-zones-and-maps/what-is-my-flood-risk).

Sources: FEMA NFHL Flood Hazard Zones (Polygons), FEMA NFHL Flood Hazard Zones, FEMA NFHL Base Flood Elevation & Cross-Section Lines · Related findings: Ground elevation vs base flood elevation, Neighborhood flood zone distribution, Neighborhood flood zone distribution, FEMA NFHL Base Flood Elevation & Cross-Section Lines

Evidence grade capped at SCREENING: this check's source/method is screening-authority (per the check's declared method), so it cannot support a parcel-level determination.

Sources: USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (Polygons), Florida Water Management Inventory (FLWMI) — Parcel Water/Wastewater, Florida Per-Parcel Transmission Corridor Encumbrance Screen (HIFLD), FEMA National Risk Index — Census Tracts, Florida Qualified Improved-Property Comparable Sales, Florida Per-Parcel Road Access: Frontage + Landlocked Screen (TIGER), Florida Per-Parcel Terrain: Ground Elevation + Slope (USGS 3DEP) · Related findings: NWI wetlands coverage of target parcel, FLWMI drinking water and wastewater classification, High-voltage transmission corridor encumbrance screen, FEMA National Risk Index tract multi-hazard profile, Improved institutional sales benchmark, Parcel road centerline proximity band, Florida Per-Parcel Terrain: Ground Elevation + Slope (USGS 3DEP)

Recorded at SCREENING grade — this determination is not linked to any vetted-primitive invocation (no evidence_refs cited), so the engine cannot vouch for it as a determination; a vetted primitive is required to establish one here.

Sources: Florida Statewide Parcels (FDOR Cadastral), US Census ACS 5-year — Census Tracts · Related findings: Assessor parcel and building characteristics, Census tract socioeconomic and housing characteristics

SCREENING neighborhood tiling: each of the target's disk cells is assigned the class of the finest-resolution coverage cell covering it; shares are over the 19-cell k-disk (k=2, H3 res 8), not a determination for any single parcel.

Sources: FEMA NFHL Flood Hazard Zones · Related findings: Neighborhood flood zone distribution, Neighborhood flood zone distribution

Located by grid cell, not by geometry (grid resolution r8; one cell can be larger than an entire parcel): a match means the mapped feature was indexed into a cell the subject occupies, not that it overlaps the subject. Fill rule: CENTRE containment — for an AREAL source, a cell is tagged only when its own centre falls inside the feature, so a feature containing no cell centre is missing from this index entirely and a non-match is weaker evidence of absence than a geometric test would be; a point-located source indexes to exactly one cell and is not subject to that loss.

Sources: FEMA NFHL Flood Hazard Zones · Related findings: Neighborhood flood zone distribution, Neighborhood flood zone distribution

FEMA Zone A (D_Zone value 'A') — the 1%-annual-chance floodplain; base flood elevation NOT determined.

Sources: FEMA NFHL Flood Hazard Zones · Related findings: Neighborhood flood zone distribution, Neighborhood flood zone distribution

FEMA Zone AE (D_Zone value 'AE') — the 1%-annual-chance floodplain with base flood elevations determined.

Sources: FEMA NFHL Flood Hazard Zones · Related findings: Neighborhood flood zone distribution, Neighborhood flood zone distribution